Enterprise Architecture Training Courses - Slovakia

Getting the overview of NAF itself and how NAF fit's in to the bigger picture. What to do and not to do. Good EA exercise. Useful for our company and excellent for me as a noose on SESAR. Impressive to see the speed with which the trainer reads UML and models in general. Working at high level, but at the same time keeping down to earth and showing practical use.

Many practical tips for everyday use. Atmosphere.

interaction

The way of conducting classes, contact with the teacher. The level of knowledge ideally suited to your needs.

Organizing knowledge

Very good contact with the group, despite the unusually uninteresting topic.

a lot of practical exercises

well-structured issues

Form of presentation.

flexibility in conducting training (discussing additional issues and topics) and working on examples from our company (very good basis for building processes)

all training

Flexibility in allowing customer to identify the real-world issues impacted by the subject matter.

I found the course structure to be very well thought out. While some of my colleagues failed to see Kristin's intentions I feel that the way he presented the material and managed to connect basic concepts with a much broader set of complex issues was spot on.

I liked the fact that his questions where creating subjects on matters that required discussion with colleagues on real life situations.

I really enjoyed the real examples and exercises.

I enjoyed the interaction of the group to solve the issues.

Instructor was very engaged and helpful.

I liked the mix of modeling anecdotes, lessons learned and real world experiences.

Very interactive, very good training pace, informative and helpful for applying to real world projects.

The structure of lecture, in structure led demonstration and then group work was good a reinforcing topic.

Coach approach

Form of conducting classes, scope of training and materials

The clarity of the message and the comparison to the 'life' situation in my opinion helps to illustrate the example and remember it

Diagram design in EA.

great knowledge and experience of the trainer as well as excellent contact with the group

exercises with activity diagrams

Lots of examples in a form that allowed to remember the theory through simple associations

exercises

The theory felt quite complete, we handled all important subjects. It was very nice we could zoom in on our use-case Achievements, which helped us with understanding the theory.

Atmosphere

Very nice examples

way of running

All. The host was great, he had great knowledge and experience. A real professional. One of the best trainings I've been to.

way of conducting training

practical

practice and myself

An attitude on practicality

examples, the approach of the teacher

Remembering all names. Adjusting the training to the participants' needs.

A lot of examples + substantive preparation of the trainer.

dynamics of training and speaking, loud voice, simple language,

Theoretical issues with UML

interesting and interesting way of transferring knowledge, the lecturer passed knowledge even beyond the scope of the subject of the training (knowledge from UML as a language)

The number of technologies covered; The real time examples and running the software on course;.

The labs were very helpful for me in order to understand the concept.

I liked the training was well divided between theory and exercises.

I mostly liked his subject knowledge and style.

I really liked the real life examples.

Flip was friendly, interesting, and engaging and he worked hard to maintain a good connection with the audience. He has an excellent knowledge of MagicDraw and SysML and communicated his knowledge clearly and effectively.

Flip was a knowledgeable and affable trainer.

I liked it all. Very informative and pace was perfect.

I enjoyed the fact that I was following the course on my own computerand exercises.

Exercise done immediately after each diagram session.

I mostly liked the approach and topic driving.

I mostly liked summarizing and highlighting important topics.

I generally was benefit from the good set of useful information.

The discussions that came out of it.

The lectures were very concise and to the point. The hands-on exercises were very helpful, we wish we have more hands-on in the future.

I generally liked the material is good.

That Filip has the whole SysML standard in mind and was able to answer every question.

I was benefit from the vast experience on the subject with practical tips on how to implement in real life production environment.

I enjoyed the discussions of different infrastructures with models on the board.

I genuinely was benefit from the clear explanations, good examples.

I genuinely enjoyed the informative.

Excellent trainer, practical knowledge being passed on, easy to understand, links to application of the skills in real scenarios.

I enjoyed actually working with the tool. Understanding different techniques.

Flip was very engaging and easy to interact with. Made everyone feel comfortable during exercises. Provided great individual focus.

The subject was well taught and there was a good coverage of topics. Examples were clear and effective to read from.

Delivery of training was interactive and interesting to follow.

I enjoyed seeing the examples used in magic draw. It helped show the very high level concepts presented in the lectures into more accessible and understandable examples.

Trainer was friendly and knowledgeable about the subject. Kept the course interesting and light heated.

I enjoyed how we split into groups to do activities and shared with the class. This helped understand the different ways SysML can be utilized, and getting immediate feedback from Flip.

Flip was great, very approachable and knowledgeable on SGML and associated tools. Highly recommended.

I commend his training style of reaching out to the delegates individually and discussing a short introduction first on a subject whenever necessary before going into detail. Lastly, for providing suggestions and references related to the training that we can use in the future.

The trainer is very approachable and knowledgeable about the subject. Looking forward to being trained again by this amazing guy.

The knowledge and experience of the trainer that is very evident on his lecture.

All the mentioned tools are explained thoroughly.

More Illustration, less visual presentation. The diagram of a pipeline of micro services, how it works from client to server. The recommended tools and reference.

I really was benefit from the competence of trainer.

Very sympathetic trainer with excellent knowledge.

I like the way it is presented and structured (Requirements --> State Machine) and how the trainer tailored the training to our needs.

Instructor was very good and knowledagble. Made the course fun.

Well, paced. Clear examples. Logical sequence of ideas.

I liked this training covered lots of gaps between theory and practice of SysML.

I was benefit from the thorough and good background knowledge and lots fo shortcuts and tips and tricks.

I was benefit from the able to use the tool alongside the instructor.

It was friendly and very related to what I need.

Combining SysML with the use of MagicDraw, Filip was great as well and kept us engaged.

Presenter was knowledgeable about the subject and course was relatively informal.

I generally was benefit from the lots of info, engaging instructor.

Work on a specific case

Theoretical knowledge

Work in groups + interesting examples

Exercises.

Many practical exercises, a good regulation of working time between the theoretical and practical part

A lot of specific examples. The way the trainer communicated was appropriate for the audience.

I enjoyed the mixture of lectures and code practice.

Getting an structured overview over existing best-practices in software design. The hands-on exercises. We could also ask questions and get detailed replies.

Hands-on exercises The attentive trainer noticed whenever a problem occurred during the hands-on exercises and helped me to solve the problem.

I like to contact the discussion section.

I generally was benefit from the good set of useful information.

The discussions that came out of it.

I generally liked the material is good.